Free Trade Area of the Americas - FTAA |
![]() |
Declarations |
Committee |
Committees |
Facilitation |
Society |
Database |
Cooperation Program |
||||
|
|||||||||||
Public FTAA -
COMMITTEE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES ON THE PARTICIPATION OF CONTRIBUTION IN RESPONSE TO THE OPEN INVITATION
Executive Summary The Association of American Chambers of
Commerce in Latin America, the U.S. Section of the Brazil-U.S. Business
Council, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce welcome this opportunity to
present our views on the emerging Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).
We strongly support free trade in the hemisphere, and we have regularly
provided substantive comments and recommendations to the Americas Business
Fora and to the trade ministers. In addition to these specific recommendations,
our submission includes three general recommendations. First, we urge the
34 governments participating in the FTAA process to make the private
sector a full partner the negotiations. We applaud the recent decision of
the Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) to post on the official FTAA Web
site an official checklist on implementation of the business facilitation
measures approved at the Toronto FTAA Ministerial in November 1999. The
checklist indicates whether and how the 34 governments have implemented
the eight customs-related business facilitation measures agreed in
Toronto. We call on the 34 governments to build upon
this decision and make a more concerted effort to engage the private
sector in the negotiations. We urge the negotiators to post summaries of
draft texts on the Internet from time to time or find other ways to
involve the private sector. As our second general recommendation, we wish
to register our opposition to efforts to link trade policy to rules on
labor conditions and environmental protection. Nearly all economists agree
that free trade raises incomes, and higher incomes lead in turn to
improvements in labor and environmental standards. Efforts to block trade liberalization in the
interest of promoting labor or environmental standards fly in the face of
these facts. All too often, calls for trade-linked mechanisms to enforce
labor and environmental standards are simply protectionism by another
name. In fact, advocates of labor and environmental standards often seek
to impose constraints in the very areas where Latin America’s economies
are at their most competitive. Improving labor conditions and environmental
protection is important, and we advocate serious discussions in
international fora on how to address these vital concerns. But trade
liberalization is inherently beneficial to workers and the environment,
and trade agreements should not be contingent upon labor or environmental
standards. Finally, we urge the 34 FTAA participants to
expedite the negotiations. The TNC is apparently making good progress in
preparing the bracketed text that will serve as the first draft of the
FTAA. In light of this progress, the 2005 deadline seems needlessly
distant. In the wake of the Buenos Aires FTAA Ministerial in April 2001,
the remaining work will be largely a matter of political will. This being
the case, the FTAA could surely be completed in 2002. We therefore recommend that the trade ministers
establish a new deadline of December 31, 2002, to complete the text of the
FTAA. Two years is sufficient time to make the political decisions that
will form the basis of an agreement, and ratification of the agreement by
the hemisphere’s governments can still be completed well before the 2005
deadline. Free trade will bring substantial benefits to all of the
countries of the hemisphere. We should seize these benefits without delay. |
|
|
|
|