Free Trade Area of the Americas - FTAA

español

 
Ministerial
Declarations
Trade Negotiations
Committee
Negotiating
Groups
Special
Committees
Business
Facilitation
Civil
Society
Trade&Tariff
Database
Hemispheric
Cooperation
Program

Home Countries Sitemap A-Z list Governmental Contact Points

 
 

Public
FTAA.soc/w/123/Add.1
October 23, 2000


Original: English

FTAA - COMMITTEE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES ON THE PARTICIPATION OF
CIVIL SOCIETY

CONTRIBUTION IN RESPONSE TO THE OPEN INVITATION


Name (s) (1) Jake Caldwell, Trade & Environment Program Coordinator, National Wildlife Federation
(2) A. Paige Fischer, Director of Forest and Trade Program, Pacific Environment and Resources Center
(3) Cameron Griffith, Director of Federal Relations, Consumer’s Choice Council
(4) Antonia Juhasz, Director, International Trade and Forest Programs, American Lands Alliance
(5) Steven Porter, Senior Attorney, Center for International Environmental Law
(6) Daniel Seligman, Senior Trade Fellow, Sierra Club
(7) Martin Wagner, Director, International Program, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
(8) David Waskow, Trade Policy Analyst, Friends of the Earth
Organization(s)
(if applicable)
 
(1) National Wildlife Federation
(2) Pacific Environment and Resources Center
(3) Consumer’s Choice Council
(4) American Lands Alliance
(5) Center for International Environmental Law
(6) Sierra Club
(7) Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund
(8) Friends of the Earth
Country (ies) /
Region (s)
USA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Trade rules generally discourage laws that distinguish between products based upon how they are manufactured or that use other nonperformance related criteria. Accordingly, the coverage of government procurement under the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) could threaten numerous laws that use procurement preferences to promote environmental protection and other policy objectives. In the United States, environmental procurement preferences exist at the federal, state, and local levels. For the last twenty-five years, Congress has required federal agencies to purchase products containing the highest percentage of recycled materials practical. In addition, President Clinton has issued an executive order directing federal agencies to purchase “environmentally preferable” and biobased products. Similarly, 48 states and numerous municipalities have environmental procurement preferences.

These laws could be protected by including a broad exception for environmental procurement preferences in the FTAA. The exception should be drafted to apply to procurement measures that are intended to preserve both living and nonliving resources, and should not contain language suggesting that environmental procurement measures should be the least trade restrictive means of achieving the environmental objective. The exception should also explicitly state that governments may use procurement criteria, including criteria based on process and production methods, that address the environmental implications of the products they purchase both within and beyond their territorial jurisdiction.

In addition, the negotiations on the procurement provisions need to be conducted in a transparent manner. The current secrecy surrounding the negotiations makes it difficult for civil society organizations and members of the public to provide comments on the negotiations, and threatens to undermine political support for the FTAA.

 
countries sitemap a-z list governmental contact points