| Free Trade Area of the Americas - FTAA | 
  
		 | 
         
           Declarations  | 
         
         Committee  | 
         
           Committees  | 
         
           Facilitation  | 
         
           Society  | 
         
           Database  | 
         
           Cooperation Program  | 
      ||||
 
  | 
      |||||||||||
| 
       
      Public 
 FTAA - 
      COMMITTEE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES ON THE PARTICIPATION OF        
      CONTRIBUTION IN RESPONSE TO THE OPEN AND ONGOING INVITATION 
 
       THE FTAA PROCESS – NUEVO LEON – 2004 - DECLARATION OF 
PRINCIPLES - MINISTERIAL  
 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON SMALLER ECONOMIES (CGSE) 
		
 ITEM 19 
      
    	 The desired results cannot be 
    reached with financial support alone, and if they were, the results would be 
    coupled with extensive misery, numerous dead and great suffering. For this 
    reason, the countries that make up the “smaller economies” need support not 
    only in the form of material capital but also, and simultaneously, in the 
    form of moral and scientific intellectual capital and it is therefore 
    appropriate to suggest a “fourth way,” the Workers’ Sociocracy which is 
    neither communist, fascist, nazi nor democratic. In fact, it is a transition 
    stage leading to democracy. Besides being a regime whose structure would 
    facilitate reducing corruption, various other actions would enhance the 
    economy during a first stage, such as:   
     Small enterprises, big business?  No - Small 
    enterprises, big problems – great waste  What we should have are large, private enterprises, 
    private oligopolies whose objectives are the rational use of raw materials, 
    which are becoming scarce worldwide. 
     Parastate monopolies, which hold 
    national/international strategic wealth, would be the owners of the natural 
    deposits that produce strategic raw materials such as oil. These enterprises 
    should sign agreements to guarantee supply, at market price and with 
    contingency clauses, to all important international consumers through their 
    multinationals. These agreements, bilaterally endorsed, would be monitored 
    by the FTAA.   
    Parastate monopolies would thus have the means to formulate 
social plans for their citizens with a portion of the income obtained. Consider 
the example of Petrobras in Brazil.  
  
 This would prevent having the same situation observed in Arab 
countries where large, rich multinational and national enterprises exist 
alongside people living in misery. This generates only conflict. Never-ending 
conflict.  | 
    
| 
 | 
      
 | 
      
 | 
      
 | 
      ||